The 5 Most Surprising Rules for Getting Better (From an ISO Standard)

Mention an "improvement program," and you often conjure images of bureaucratic checklists, rigid procedures, and initiatives that feel more about compliance than creating real value. We tend to associate formal programs with a kind of sterile, top-down process that stifles the very creativity needed to actually get better.

But what if one of the most practical, human-centered, and flexible guides to improvement came from the most unlikely of places? An international standard for learning services, ISO 29993, offers a refreshingly clear philosophy on what it truly means to enhance performance. It answers the one question that matters most for any service provider: Does the organization use what it learns to improve?

This article distills the most impactful and counter-intuitive lessons on continuous improvement from this unexpected source. Forget the complex jargon; these are the core principles that can help any team or organization get better over time.

Five Counter-Intuitive Lessons on Continuous Improvement

Here are five key takeaways that challenge common assumptions about what it takes to drive meaningful and sustainable improvement.

Focus on Progress, Not Perfection

The biggest fear associated with any standard is the demand for flawless execution. We imagine that to "comply," we must be perfect. The ISO 29993 philosophy directly rejects this idea. Its core principle is about ongoing enhancement, not achieving some static, unattainable state of perfection. It recognizes that improvement is a journey.

This mindset is powerfully captured in a single guiding insight from the standard:

ISO 29993 does not expect perfection—but it does expect progress.

This simple shift in perspective is more than just liberating—it’s a strategic enabler of a true learning culture. By prioritizing progress, it fosters psychological safety, allowing teams to acknowledge weaknesses without fear of reprisal. This reduces the paralysis that often accompanies the fear of failure, encouraging the very experimentation and incremental risk-taking that genuine improvement requires. The goal isn't to be flawless; it's to be demonstrably better tomorrow than you are today.

Build a Learning Loop, Don’t Just Plug Holes

Most teams are good at reacting to problems. A customer complains, and we fix the issue. A process breaks, and we patch it. This is a one-time fix—an informal, reactive approach that solves an immediate problem but teaches the organization very little.

The standard advocates for a more structured and intentional system of continuous improvement. It promotes a "closed-loop system" where learning is built into the operational DNA: Identify needs -> Design -> Deliver -> Evaluate -> Improve. This cyclical process creates organizational learning, turning isolated fixes into institutional knowledge. Instead of one person learning a lesson on one day, the entire organization gets smarter. While plugging a hole fixes a single leak, building a learning loop improves the entire system's resilience and capability over time.

Let Your Users (or Learners) Lead the Way

Whose opinion should drive improvement? It’s easy for teams to get caught up in internal debates or assumptions. According to the standard, this is the wrong approach. True improvement must be centered on the end-user and based on real evidence.

The standard outlines a sophisticated, 360-degree view of evidence that goes far beyond just customer complaints. Key sources of improvement inputs include:

• Assessment results
• Learner feedback and satisfaction data
• Complaints and support records
• Trainer and facilitator feedback
• Changes in market or industry needs
• Internal reviews or audits

This comprehensive approach shows that evidence is both reactive (responding to feedback) and proactive (anticipating market shifts and performing internal audits). It ensures that improvement efforts remain value-focused for the user, not just a process-focused exercise. The critical question is not "What do we think is better?" but "What does the evidence tell us needs to improve?"

Ditch the Rigid Procedures, Keep the Purpose

Here is perhaps the most surprising lesson from a formal standard: it doesn't care about bureaucracy. ISO 29993 does not require a formal improvement procedure, a complex quality management system, or extensive documentation. It doesn't even mandate a specific framework like Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA).

This flexibility is rooted in a philosophy of trust. The standard trusts the organization to find its own path, valuing proven outcomes over prescribed processes. The focus is entirely on the evidence of improvement, not the specific model used to achieve it. This empowers organizations to choose methods that fit their unique culture while holding them accountable for results. It’s a direct rejection of the “bureaucratic checklist” approach, proving that intent and results matter far more than the procedure itself.

Meaningful and Intentional Beats Big and Grandiose

Continuous improvement doesn't have to mean launching a massive, resource-intensive transformation project. In fact, the standard explicitly states that "Small improvements are acceptable if they are meaningful and intentional."

This practical principle makes getting better feel far more accessible. Meaningful improvement can be as simple as:

• Updating learning outcomes based on assessment results.
• Revising materials after receiving specific learner feedback.
• Introducing new delivery methods to improve engagement.
• Enhancing trainer professional development based on performance reviews.
• Improving user guidance after analyzing common support complaints.

Each of these is a small, targeted action based on evidence. By prioritizing a series of intentional enhancements over a single grandiose initiative, teams can build momentum and create a sustainable culture of improvement without becoming overwhelmed.

Conclusion: Are You Getting Better Over Time?

Taken together, these five lessons paint a clear picture. Genuine, continuous improvement isn't a rigid set of rules or a bureaucratic exercise. It is a flexible, evidence-based, and user-centered mindset focused on making tangible progress. It’s about building a system for learning, listening to your audience, and having the courage to make small, intentional changes.

Ultimately, the standard boils everything down to one essential, guiding question that every team, leader, and organization should be asking themselves.

So, how does your team, your product, or your process get better over time?

The most profound answer may not come from a new management trend, but from the simple, focused wisdom hidden within the rules.

Share This Article

Found this useful? Share it with your network: